劳动人事争议裁审衔接机制构建的新思考  

The New Thinking on the Construction of Mechanism of Linking Arbitration to Litigation in Labor and Personnel Disputes Settlement

作　　者：周湖勇[1] 

机构地区：[1]温州大学法政学院,浙江温州325035

出　　处：《政法论丛》2017年第5期101-110,共10页Journal of Political Science and Law

基　　金：浙江省温州市社会科学规划课题"劳动人事争议仲裁民间化;社会化问题研究--基于温州市瓯海区劳动人事争议仲裁委员会高教园区派出庭实践的思考"(17WSK046)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：我国劳动人事争议仲裁和诉讼存在实体和程序上的衔接不畅。要从根本上解决该问题,必须从正确定位劳动仲裁的性质着手,并在此基础上厘清劳动仲裁和诉讼衔接的实质:劳动仲裁和诉讼不是普通仲裁和诉讼的关系,而是劳动人事争议专门机构和普通法院的关系,应将劳动仲裁定位为司法性或准司法性,与此一致,裁审关系是特殊的一审和二审的关系。为此,需要重构劳动人事争议处理审级制度,取消和劳动仲裁性质不相吻合的程序和制度,并赋予劳动仲裁机构保全等强制性权力。The Cohesion of Chinese labor and personnel disputes arbitration and litigation in entities and proce- dures is not smooth, to fundamentally solve the problem, we must proceed from the nature of the correct positioning of labor arbitration, and clarify the essence of cohesion of the labor arbitration and litigation. Relationship between labor arbitration and litigation is not the relationship between common arbitration and litigation , but the relationship between specialized labor disputes agencies and the general court; labor arbitration should be positioned as a judicial or quasi judicial adjudication, In accordance with this, the special relationship Should be the relationship between the first and second instance, therefore need to reconstruct trail grade system of the labor dispute settlement, to cancel inconsistent procedure and system, and to give Labor and Personnel Dispute Arbitration Committee preservation power.

关 键 词：劳动人事争议仲裁 衔接 裁审关系 

分 类 号：DF479.1[政治法律—民商法学]