印证与最佳解释推理——刑事证明模式的多元发展  

Corroboration and Inference to the Best Explanation:Diversification of the Mode of Criminal Proof

作　　者：罗维鹏[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川大学法学院

出　　处：《法学家》2017年第5期117-130,共14页The Jurist

基　　金：中国法学会2015年度部级法学研究课题"庭审实质化的实现路径研究"(CLS2015C45)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：印证一直被学界和实务界普遍接受为我国的刑事证明模式,但是近期研究对印证模式的正当性提出了质疑。印证模式主要在定义、效果和方法等方面受到一些学者的批判。解决以上问题,首先需要搁置不必要的语义争议,其次是完善印证模式运行的制度环境,此外是探索新的证明模式。当前最迫切的是,探索新的证明模式以与印证模式互补。最佳解释推理由于可以检验印证、解释孤证和加强心证,并且与印证具有相容性,在一定条件下可引入司法领域作为弥补印证模式缺陷的一种新的证明模式。Corroboration has been accepted as Chinese mode of criminal proof by scholars and practitioners,but some current researches have questioned the validity of this model.The problem of definition,effect and method are the main defects of corroboration.To solve the above problems,we should put aside the unnecessary notional disputes at first,and improve the system environment for running corroboration mode better,and then explore a new mode of proof.The essential task is to explore the new mode of proof so as to complement the defects of corroboration.Inference to the best explanation has the function of testing the effect of corroboration,explaining the meaning of isolated evidence and enhancing the accuracy of verification of evidence,so it can be introduced into the judicial field as a kind of new mode of proof.

关 键 词：刑事证明 印证模式 最佳解释推理 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]