刑事裁判文书中目的解释的实践运用  

The Practice Application of Objective Interpretation in Criminal Judgments

作　　者：石聚航[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]南昌大学法学院 [2]南昌大学立法研究中心

出　　处：《法学家》2017年第5期131-143,共13页The Jurist

摘　　要：通过对刑事裁判文书中目的解释的实践运用研究,表明刑法理论和司法实践对待目的解释存在明显的差异。主观目的解释与客观目的解释的选择性运用,须根据司法实践的具体情况而定。目的解释不是决定性的解释方法,各种解释方法之间也不存在位阶性。目的解释既可以用来佐证文义解释和体系解释的结论,也可以用来限定文义解释结论的宽泛性。同样的,体系解释也可以用来佐证目的解释的结论。刑事裁判文书中目的解释的运用法则呈现多元化的特征。在建构目的解释的司法运用规则时,不宜以目的解释作为直接根据认定行为的性质,在刑事裁判文书中应叙明规范目的的识别方法,并通过反向论证来检验目的解释的合理性。The criminal judgments suggests that obvious differences exist between criminal law theory and judicial practice.The use of subjective interpretation and objective interpretation depends on the specific situation of the judicial practice.The objective interpretation isnt the definitive interpretation methods.Interpretation methods between rates of sex dont exist.Objective interpretation can be used to support system of direct interpretation and explanation to the conclusion to restrict the broadness of direct interpretation conclusions.Similarly,the systematic interpretation can also be used to support objective interpretation conclusions.The use of the interpretations in judgment has diversified characteristics.In the process of constructing the judiciary rule of objective interpretation,it is unfavorable to explain as directly according to the nature of the decision behavior in criminal judgment.The criminal judgment should state identification method of objective interpretation,and through a reverse proof to check the conclusion of the objective interpretation.

关 键 词：目的解释 刑事裁判文书 文义解释 体系解释 法定犯 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]