汉代骚体赋的京都抒写  

Capital Writing in Sao Fu of Han Dynasty

作　　者：侯文学[1] 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学文学院

出　　处：《华南师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2017年第5期164-171,共8页Journal of South China Normal University：Social Science Edition

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"汉代文学与都邑文化"(11YJC751030);吉林大学前沿与交叉学科项目"汉代城市与汉赋"(2012QY003)

摘　　要：汉代骚体赋承续了屈辞的恋都主题,而在汉代不同时期的政治环境中具有分化的表现。屈辞抒写的郢都,恒与家国、姓族、故乡乃至自身命运、政治理想、姓族荣耀一体交融。然而骚体赋在东汉中期以前的帝京眷恋却排斥了故乡的思念,变成政治热情和出处志节的单项维系,这是皇权稳固的时代士人政治热情的集中体现。东汉中后期皇权渐衰的政治局面和仕进不达的现实困境反映为骚体赋抒写对于京都的疏离,故乡的回归成为抒写的主题。从屈辞到骚体京都抒写的汉代演变,显示为一体文学的主题回环与分化过程,反映了士人对于政治仕进依违难决的矛盾心态。Sao Fu of Han Dynasty inherited the capital attachment theme of QU Yuan's works,but there are differentiated performances of it in the political environments of different periods of Han Dynasty. Qu Yuan's writing of his capital Ying always blends with the fate of clan,country,home and even himself,while the capital attachment of Sao Fu in the early Eastern Han Dynasty excludes the nostalgia of hometown,and turned to pure political enthusiasm and provenance of individual ambition,which is the concentrated embodiment of scholars' political enthusiasm in the era of solid imperial power.The gradual decline of imperial power and the dilemma of officialdom in the mid and late Eastern Han Dynasty are reflected as the alienation of capital and the return of hometown in the writing of Sao Fu. The evolution of capital topics from the works of Qu Yuan to the Sao Fu of Han Dynasty displays as theme circulating and differentiation of one type of literature,reflecting the scholars' contradictory mentality on political officialdom.

关 键 词：屈辞 汉代 骚赋 恋都 故乡 

分 类 号：I207.22[文学—中国文学]