庭审中心视域下的民事审前准备程序研究  

On the Civil Pretrial Preparation Procedure under the Perspective of Trial Center

作　　者：段文波[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学

出　　处：《中国法学》2017年第6期203-220,共18页China Legal Science

基　　金：国家社科基金"迈向制度理性的民事庭审阶段化构造研究"(项目批准号:15XFX012)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：从1982年民事诉讼法到2012年民事诉讼法,我国审前准备程序的改革经历了以公正为名的虚化到以效率为指向的弱化,尽管在外观上逐渐呈现出独立化样态,但却深陷公正与效率的矛盾而致功能丧失。从充实庭审的现实需要出发,有必要对我国审前准备程序进行重构。从庭审中心论立场而言,我国应当建构期日型审前准备程序,而非现行两阶段分置式的审前准备程序。因此,完善我国审前准备程序的核心内容,绝非止于现有认识上的重置法官与当事人的权限配置关系,赋予当事人争点决定权并限缩法官权限即可,而是要遵循当事人事实主张的规制原理,以有理性评价为指针整理、限缩、深化并确认双方当事人的争议焦点。藉此,庭审始能高效地实施集中证据调查以发现真实。From the Civil Procedure Law for trial implementation in 1982 to the current civil procedural law in 2012, the reform of the pretrial preparation procedure in our country has undergone a stage from blurring in the name of justice to weakening in the direction of efficiency. Although it seems to be independent from the appearance, it actually loses all functions for being mired in the contradiction between justice and efficiency. It is necessary to reconstruct the pretrial preparation procedure of our country from the realistic needs of the trial. And from the standpoint of the trial center, China should construct a date type pretrial preparation procedure rather than a two stage pretrial preparation procedure. Therefore, to improve the core content of our pretrial preparation process is not only resetting the relationship of power allocation between the judge and the party from the existing knowledge and giving right of decision to the party and limiting the authority of the judge, but to follow the regulative principle of facts that the party claim, and arrange, limit, deepen and confirm the focus of the dispute between the two parties rationally. Due to these, the trial will be able to effectively implement evidence survey to find out the facts.

关 键 词：庭审中心 审前准备程序 口头辩论主义 争点整理 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]