合法性构成的调整与上访治理逻辑的演变--一个历史社会学的考察  

The Adjustment of Legitimacy Construction and the Changes of Petition-Handling Rationale:An Analysis from the Perspective of Historical Sociology

作　　者：桂晓伟[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学

出　　处：《华中科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2018年第1期108-116,共9页Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目(16YJC840004); 武汉大学自主科研项目(人文社会科学,2017QN045)

摘　　要：国家视角的上访研究近年来受到学界关注,但从何种理论切入却一直不甚明朗。本文发现,传统向现代的转型使国家合法性遭遇了"主观"民意凸显而"客观"传统弱化的挑战,这迫使国家重新寻找理论资源,在巩固其"权力来源"的同时,亦强调其"权力效用"。这一调整引发上访治理逻辑从"惩戒—动员—权衡"的历史演变。借助合法性的"主/客观基础"和"权力来源/效用"两个维度,本文更加清晰地展现了这一由"宏观要素"调整引发的"微观机制"改变,从而在理论和方法上推进了既有研究。While state-centered research of petition handling has received a lot of attentions in recent years,scholars still have not found a proper perspective to enrich this line of study. This article suggests that state legitimacy is a suitable angle to undertake this task by distinguishing two dimensions of state legitimacy:the subjective/objective basis of legitimacy and the sources/efficiency of state power. In specific,the transition of Chinese state from traditional period to modern time has weakened its objective basis of legitimacy and thus increased its need on subjective basis of legitimacy. This further makes the state to adjust the sources of state power and meanwhile improve the efficiency of state power. As a result,the rationale of petition-handling has changed from punishment,mobilization to pragmatism. These two dimensions can help us better understand the adjustment of state legitimacy and its influence on the petition-handling rationale in Chinese history.

关 键 词：合法性 历史分析 主/客观基础 权力来源/效用 上访治理 

分 类 号：D632.8[政治法律—政治学]