检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《工程力学》2018年第1期126-135,共10页Engineering Mechanics
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(51208189);湖南省杰出青年科学基金项目(14JJ1014)
摘 要:比较了简支梁桥和连续梁桥的应变和挠度动力放大系数的大小关系。首先对作用有移动常量力的简支梁和连续梁进行理论推导,分别得到了应变和挠度动力放大系数并进行了比较。为考虑动力车辆荷载影响,采用移动弹簧质量作为车辆模型建立了车桥耦合振动模型进行数值模拟。理论推导和数值模拟的结果均表明:应变动力放大系数基本小于挠度动力放大系数;两者比值受很多因素影响,其中计算桥梁响应所用的桥梁模态阶数对比值的影响较大。A comparison of dynamic amplification factors calculated from bridge strain and deflection of a simply-supported beam and a continuous beam is conducted. Firstly, the strain and deflection dynamic amplification factors are theoretically derived and compared based on a simply-supported beam and a continuous beam under the action of a constant moving force. To consider the effect of dynamic vehicle loading, numerical simulations are performed using a developed vehicle-bridge coupled model while adopting a moving spring mass vehicle model. The results from both the theoretical analysis and numerical simulation show that the strain dynamic amplification factor is less than the deflection dynamic amplification factor and that their ratio is influenced by a number of factors, among which the number of vibration modes used in calculating the bridge responses has a significant influence.
关 键 词:车桥相互作用 动力放大系数 数值模拟 应变 挠度
分 类 号:U441.3[建筑科学—桥梁与隧道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200