检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京财经大学党校办 [2]南京财经大学公共管理学院,南京210023
出 处:《教育发展研究》2017年第23期42-49,共8页Research in Educational Development
基 金:国家自然科学基金青年项目"普通高中生均成本标准化测算及其应用--基于教育支出功能分类改革数据的研究"(71704073)的部分成果
摘 要:2012年我国财政性教育经费占当年GDP比重为4.28%,首次达到并超过教育财政投入4%的战略目标。伴随着我国经济发展步入"新常态",经济下行导致财政收入放缓,给"后4%时代"的教育财政投入带来较大的不确定性。基于分数布朗运动模型,通过Whittle和R/S两种方法对我国历年财政性教育经费的赫斯特指数H进行实证测算。测算结果均显示:"后4%时代"的我国教育财政投入增长具有短记忆性,财政性教育经费在未来不能延续前一阶段增长趋势,教育财政投入4%的"政策红利"已开始逐步消失。In 2012, China's financial education funds accounted for 4.28% of the proportion of GDP, for the first time to reach and exceed 4% of the strategic objectives of the financial investment of education. With China's economic development into The New Normal, the economic downturn led to a slowdown in revenue, which brings greater uncertainty to the post 4% era of education financial investment. Based on the Fractional Brown motion model, the Hearst index H empirical calculation of the financial education funds in our country over the years is carried out by the Whittle and R/S two methods. The results showed that: "the post 4% era" of China's financial investment in education growth has a short memory, financial education funds cannot continue the growth trend of the previous stage in the future, and the financial investment in education 4% of the dividend policy has begun to gradually disappear.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28