当海德格尔与老子研究“相遇”  

When Heidegger "Meets" Lao Zi's Research

作　　者：何玉国[1] 

机构地区：[1]天津财经大学人文学院,天津300222

出　　处：《河北科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2017年第4期72-76,共5页Journal of Hebei University of Science and Technology:Social Sciences

基　　金：天津市2016年度哲学社会科学规划项目(TJZW16-005)

摘　　要：有关海德格尔与老子的研究,学界成果卓著,其主要集中在"体验回—溯"两者之间思想关系的探讨。文章另辟蹊径,接续海德格尔有关"用欧洲概念‘理解’非欧洲文化之不可能"的讨论,使其与既有的老子研究相互碰撞和交锋,认为时下老子研究偏于以西释中,囿于西方哲学而有意割裂《道德经》所开发和发明出来的所谓"本体论、价值论、存有(在)论、形上论"等众多说辞,导致老子之道完全实有化、固定化,把老子之道完全框置、摆置、圈限于某种封闭的系统和结构之中,丧失了老子之"道"已有的既"虚"又"实"的丰富内涵。重拾老子书写经验,以"体验回—溯"路径作为老子研究方法论,探讨一种摆脱"欧洲概念"的影响和陷阱的可能性,重新开启老子之道的丰富性研究。The academic achievement in the research on Heidegger and Lao Zi is remarkable.The main focus is the discussion of the ideological relationship between the two.This article＇s path to Heidegger＇s places on the discussion on＂Is it possible to understand the non-european capital of culture in European concept？＂ under the existing Lao Zi＇s research colliding with each other.The author thinks that the research of Lao Zi is constrained by western philosophy,and intentionally isolated from the so-called＂theory of ontology,axiology,entities（in）and metaphysical theory＂ developed and invented by Dao De Jing,which concretes and immobilizes the Dao of Lao Zi.Therefore,the Dao of Lao Zi is completely confined to some kind of closed system and structure,thus losing the rich connotation of＂ Taoism＂and＂reality＂ in Dao of Lao Zi.The writing experience of Lao Zi should be regained to explore the method which gets rid of the influence and the trap of＂ uropean concept and to reopen the richness of Lao Zi＇s research by using＂experience-backtracking＂ path as the research methodology of Lao Zi.

关 键 词：海德格尔 老子 思—想 

分 类 号：B516.54[哲学宗教—外国哲学]