精神留守:留守儿童研究的新取向  

Spiritual Leaving-Behind:New Orientation for Left-Behind Children Research

作　　者：汪昌权[1] 

机构地区：[1]铜陵学院学生处,安徽铜陵244000

出　　处：《内江师范学院学报》2018年第2期12-17,共6页Journal of Neijiang Normal University

基　　金：安徽省高等教育振兴计划项目(2018x1004)

摘　　要：留守儿童研究卷帙浩繁,但良莠不齐.对已有研究进行梳理分析,将有助于重新确立留守儿童研究的正确价值取向.从文献资料来看,广义的留守儿童概念并不仅仅局限于农村,城市儿童也同样存在"留守"现象.然而,不论城市还是农村,留守儿童都不等同于问题儿童.在成长过程中,部分留守儿童各方面均很正常.至于那些出现问题的儿童,他们的问题多出在精神留守上.其原因是由于监管缺失和关爱缺乏,导致儿童所感知到的心理距离渐趋遥远.目前的留守儿童研究已显现出新的趋势,研究立场从问题儿童视角转向非问题儿童视角,研究方向从客体向度转向主体和主体间性向度,研究内容从问题与现象层面转向实践和操作层面.与此同时,对待留守儿童的关爱策略也应当由非正常关爱回归到正常关爱.There's much literature dedicated to the study of left-behind children,yet the quality is not so satisfying. The sorting out of the existing researches will be helpful to erect a correct value orientation for left-behind children research. In a broad sense,the existing literature indicates that the left-behind children are not limited to rural areas,they are also found in the cities. However,wherever the children are,we cannot say the left-behind children are problem children. In the process of growth,some left-behind children are normal in every sense while others have serious problems,of which the spiritual leaving-behind is quite typical. The reason is in large part due to lack of supervision and care,resulting in children's perception of being psychologically distanced. New trends are emerging in present research of left-behind children. The problem children perspective is giving way to the perspective from the nonproblem children. The direction of the research turns from objectivity dimension to subjectivity or inter-subjectivity dimension. The content of the research turns from the problem and the phenomenon to the practice and the operational aspect. Meanwhile,abnormal care strategy should be replaced with normal care strategy in treating left-behind children.

关 键 词：精神留守 留守儿童 问题儿童 心理距离 

分 类 号：C913[经济管理] G775[社会学]