欠缺必备条款劳动协议文本的法律效力研究  

Astudy on the validity of labor contracts lacking of essential clauses

作　　者：苟正金 

机构地区：[1]西南民族大学期刊社,四川成都610041

出　　处：《重庆大学学报（社会科学版）》2018年第2期97-107,共11页Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目"劳动关系认定实证研究"(14AFX021)

摘　　要：劳动者保护的特殊性是劳动合同订立形式书面要求的基本考量。裁判者是否可以依据劳动协议文本裁判案件是判定当事人是否履行了签订书面劳动合同法定义务的方法论。不同性质的必要条款对于裁判的重要性不完全一样。对于欠缺劳动者的个人身份信息、工作地点、工作内容、劳动合同期限、工资报酬等重大条款的协议文本因无法达致裁判的可操作性,应当认定当事人未履行书面劳动合同签订的法定义务,并因此承担相应的法律责任;欠缺的工作时间和休息休假条款为可补救性条款;欠缺劳动保护、劳动条件和职业危害防护等宣示性条款的书面文本应该视为签订了书面劳动合同。但是,经当事人双方签字的欠缺必备条款合同文本除法律特别规定外,对于合同当事人仍然具有法律约束力,不应视为无效条款,仍应作为法院裁判案件的依据。The particularity of worker protection should be taken into consideration when a written labor contract is made and entered into. Whether a judge may decide a case on the basis of the text of labor contract is the methodology of judging the parties of the contract have performed the statuary duties under contract.Essential clauses of different nature are vital to the judgment differently. Where a contract is lack of personal information of the parties,work locations,job descriptions,time limit for the labor contract,remunerations and other essential clauses,it should be decided as the parties should bear liability for the failure of performance of the statuary duties stipulated in the written contract. Lacking clauses regarding work hours, break time, and vacations should be deemed as remediable clauses. A contract has no declarative clauses regarding employment protection,work conditions,and protection against and prevention of occupational harm should be regarded that a written labor contract has been concluded. Unless otherwise specified by law,in the event of a labor contract lacking of essential clauses signed by both parties,it is still legally binding on both parties,which should not be regarded as invalid clauses,but rather the basis for judgment.

关 键 词：劳动合同 必备条款 宣示性条款 补救性条款 双倍工资 

分 类 号：D922.52[政治法律—民商法学]