检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴继峰[1]
出 处:《语言教学与研究》2018年第2期11-20,共10页Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies
基 金:北京市委组织部青年骨干个人项目(2017000020124G153);北京市教委社科一般项目(SM201710028014)的资助
摘 要:本文以50名中级汉语水平的英语母语者为研究对象,采用相关和多元回归的统计方法,考察词汇多样性、词汇复杂性、词汇正确性、句法复杂性、语法正确性五个语言区别性特征与汉语二语写作成绩的关系,并检验这五个特征在写作质量中的预测作用。研究结果发现,五个语言特征均与写作成绩显著相关,但是只有词汇复杂性、词汇正确性、语法正确性三个区别性特征能够显著预测写作质量,其中语法正确性和词汇正确性的预测能力更强。另外,本文从内部构念、测量指标等方面探讨了词汇多样性和句法复杂性没能显著预测写作质量的原因。The study investigates the relationship between five distinguishing features i.e., lexical diversity, lexical sophistication, lexical accuracy, grammatical sophistication, grammatical accuracy and Chinese as a second language writing scores, and explores the prediction of these features on writing grades through correlation and a linear regression. The research subjects are 50 English native speakers at the intermediate Chinese level. The results show these five distinguishing features are all significantly correlated with scores, but only lexical sophistication, lexical accuracy and grammatical accuracy can predict the scores significantly. The prediction power of grammatical accuracy and lexical accuracy is much bigger than lexical sophistication. Besides, we also explored the reasons why lexical diversity and grammatical sophistication don't predict the grades significantly from inside construct and measure indices.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.199.9