层级性:认罪认罚制度的另一个侧面  

The System of Pleas of Guilty and Acceptance of Punishment with Leniency Seen as a Continuum

作　　者：郭烁[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京交通大学法学院,北京100044

出　　处：《河南大学学报（社会科学版）》2018年第2期47-52,共6页Journal of Henan University(Social Sciences）

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"参与刑讯人员民事侵权责任问题研究"(16CFX030)阶段性成果;北京交通大学人文社会科学基金项目"认罪认罚从宽背景下酌定不起诉制度再审视"(2018JBW002)阶段性成果

摘　　要：诉讼经济与人身危险性是决定刑罚从宽与否的重要依据。认罪认罚从宽制度根植于实体刑罚从宽制度,主要通过程序的进一步简化来达致诉讼经济,并以此作为从宽的依据。程序的分流与简化主要应归功于简易与速裁程序本身的作用,与认罪认罚并无直接的关联性,但认罪认罚从宽制度却规定了较其他从宽制度更"宽"的从宽范围与幅度。认罪认罚存在着"认不认"与"认多少"的层级性,应以诉讼经济与人身危险性为量度建立整体性的认罪制度,以进一步完善我国的诉讼制度。The litigation economy and the degree of personal danger are important basis for determining whether the punishment is lenient or not.Pleas of guilty and acceptance of punishment with leniency is rooted in the substantive penalty lenient system,mainly through the process of further simplification to reach a litigation economy as a lenient basis.The diversion and simplification of the program are mainly attributed to the function of the speedy process itself,and have no direct relevance to the pleas of guilty and acceptance of punishment.However,the system is more lenient than before.There is a problem of＂whether admitting ＂and＂the extent of admitting＂ in the process of pleas of guilty and acceptance of punishment.It is necessary to establish an overall system according to the litigation economy and the degree of personal danger to further improve our litigation system.

关 键 词：认罪认罚 诉讼经济 刑事速裁 从宽处理 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]