黑尔功利主义与罗尔斯正义理论的争论评析  

Comments on the Argument between Hare and Rawls about the Relationship of Utilitarianism and Justice

作　　者：吴映平[1] WU Yingping(Marxism School, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu 610041, Chin)

机构地区：[1]西南民族大学马克思主义学院,四川成都610041

出　　处：《上海师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2018年第2期55-61,共7页Journal of Shanghai Normal University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：四川省教育厅重点项目(14SA0256);西南民族大学研究生学位点建设资助项目(2016XWD-S0101)

摘　　要：罗尔斯通过间接的和直接的方式非难功利主义,并从多个方面指出人们接受作为公平的正义原则而不接受功利原则的原因。黑尔从整体上对作为公平的正义原则的直觉主义本质进行了分析,提出依据于逻辑与事实的功利主义观点,以此来回应罗尔斯对功利主义的非难。该理论为解决功利主义的"平等化-最大化"难题提供了更好的方案和思路,很大程度上融合了功利主义与正义之间的关系。Rawls argued against the utilitarianism in direct and indirect ways and pointed out the reason why people accept the principle of justice as fairness instead of utilitarianism. R.M Hare analyzed the intuitionism essence of the principle of justice as fairness on the whole and proposed the opinion of utilitarianism based on facts and logic in response to Rawls＇ criticism. This theory provides a better solution to the problem of ＂equalization-maximization＂ of utilitarianism and comoromises the relationship between utilitarianism and Justice to a great extent.

关 键 词：功利主义 正义 平等化 最大化 黑尔 罗尔斯 

分 类 号：B82[哲学宗教—伦理学]