检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘朝 LIU Zhao(School of Public and Management of University of Chinese Academy of Science)
机构地区:[1]中国科学院大学公共政策与管理学院法律与知识产权系
出 处:《科学与社会》2018年第1期49-58,共10页Science and Society
摘 要:实证研究发现,车企和相关科技机构等主体在技术上的后发劣势较为明显,路权争夺激烈和路况复杂加大了技术难度,还有数量巨大的非机动车主体更可能成为交通事故受害者,构成了我国自动驾驶民事责任主体的三个主要个性。从整个主体格局上看,强势的车企和科技企业与弱势的大城市中低层市民之间形成云泥之势。这些给我国自动驾驶的技术竞争和产业发展带来挑战和困惑。为了解决问题,需要下功夫在"智能"之外,需要正视近忧在法律之外,更需要民安则为,在安全保障和交通事故责任配套制度上着手进行实实在在的变革和努力。The empirical study found that the Chinese autopilot enterprise and related technology body on technical backwardness is obvious, the right of way in China increases the technical difficulty, and there is a huge number of non-motor vehicle body which is more likely to become victims of autopilot traffic accidents. From the whole pattern of the main body, there is a great difference between the strong and weak, between the car enterprise, the technology enterprises and the middle or low level citizens of the big cities. These have brought challenges and puzzles to the technological competition and industrial development of China's autopilot. In order to solve the problems, we need to work hard on "intelligence", to face up to obstacles outside the law, and to make solid changes and efforts in supporting system of safety and traffic accidents.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3