检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:文雯[1] 连志鑫 杨帆[2] WEN Wen;LIAN Zhi-xin;YANG Fan(Institute of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084;Admissions Office, Tsinghua University, Beijing , 100084)
机构地区:[1]清华大学教育研究院,北京100084 [2]清华大学招生办公室,北京100084
出 处:《清华大学教育研究》2018年第2期111-119,共9页Tsinghua Journal of Education
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目"研究型大学跨学科教育模式下本科创新人才培养的机制研究"(71704093)
摘 要:为增加弱势学生群体高等教育入学机会,我国制定了"国家专项"、"少数民族"和"高校专项"等招生倾斜政策,对贫困地区和农村地区的家庭弱势学生进行入学机会上的特殊补偿。本研究通过对某部委直属院校2014级全体新生入学数据和调查问卷数据分析发现,上述多种招生倾斜政策整体上有效,其中政府主导的招生倾斜政策在宏观群体机会补偿方面表现更有效,高校主导的招生政策在微观个体选拔方面更为有效;另外,"国家专项"和"少数民族"中城镇户籍学生并不"弱势",政策精准性有待提高。In order to increase the access opportunity for disadvantaged students,China has enacted several policies such as the"National Special Project",the"Ethnic Minorities Project"and the"Institutional Project",so as to provide preferential treatments in college admission for disadvantaged students from poor families in poverty-stricken areas and rural areas.Drawing on the enrollment data and survey data of the Cohort 2014 students in a university directly affiliated to the Ministry of Education,this study found that the above preferential policies were overall effective.Government-initiated policies were more effective in reducing the opportunity gap between groups,while institutional policies were more effective in selecting qualified candidates.Additionally,the study found that urban students involved in the"National Special Project"and the"Ethnic Minorities Project"were actually not"disadvantaged",calling for attention on whether the policies were targeted at the desired population.
关 键 词:高考招生 倾斜政策 弱势群体 入学机会 教育公平
分 类 号:G649.21[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15