世界主要国家学科目录中体育学设置情况考察与辨析  

An Investigation and Analysis of the Inclusion of Sport Science in the Discipline Catalogues of the World's Major Countries

作　　者：王雷[1] 李平平[1] WANG Lei;LI Ping-ping(Institute of Sport Science,Guiyang University,Guiyang 550050,Chin)

机构地区：[1]贵阳学院体育学院,贵州贵阳550005

出　　处：《体育学研究》2018年第2期23-31,共9页Journal of Sports Research

基　　金：国家社科基金重大招标项目:体育学基本理论与学科体系建构研究(14ZDB128)

摘　　要："双一流"建设方案公布后,突出学科建设的逻辑思路成为我国新常态下高等教育发展路径上的重要转折。运用文献资料法和逻辑分析法,对中国、德国、法国、英国、美国和日本6个国家学科目录中体育学的设置问题进行考察和分析。研究认为:体育学在各国高等教育领域已获得普遍的学科认同和独立的学科地位;德国、法国、英国和美国的国家科学基金尚未对体育学独立设置并进行基金资助,体育学在科学研究领域的整体认同度偏低;体育学的学科地位将取决于自身科学化的水平;体育学在单个国家内部普遍形成了统一的学科名称,但国际上尚未形成统一认识,各国对体育学的学科归属认识尚不统一,学科基本理论研究亟待加强;体育学总体呈现出交叉学科的定位与研究趋势,我国体育学在学科归属上应当向交叉学科类目靠拢。After the launch of the＂ Double World-class＂ Project, discipline construction has been highlighted as an important turning point in the development of higher education in China＇s new normal, This paper investigates and analyzes the inclusion or non-inclusion of Sports Science in the national discipline catalogues of six countries, including China, Germany, France, Britain, America and Japan. This research finds that ： 1. Sport Science has won wide recognition as an independent discipline in the field of higher education; 2. Sport Science has yet to be separated out and funded by the National Science Foundations in Germany, France, Britain and the United States, indicating a fairly low degree of recognition in the field of scientific research; 3. the status of Sport Science as a discipline depends on the level of its own scientificness; 4. Sports Science has a unified discipline name within a single country, but the international community has not yet achieved a consensus as to where it belongs, and the basic theoretical research of Sport Science as a discipline should be strengthened; 5. overall, Sport Science presents itself as interdisciplinary, and in China it should be classified more as an interdiscipline than as anything else.

关 键 词：学科目录 体育学 学科制度 发达国家 

分 类 号：G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]