笔者我也——对学术写作中“我”的讨论  

The Author is Me:Discussion on I/Self of Academic Writings

作　　者：王鸿博[1] WANG Hongbo(Journal of North China University of Technology,North China Univ.of Tech.,100144,Beijing,China)

机构地区：[1]北方工业大学学报编辑部,北京100144

出　　处：《北方工业大学学报》2018年第3期131-140,共10页Journal of North China University of Technology

基　　金：2018年北京市教委基本科研业务费项目"<北方工业大学学报>核心期刊目标建设研究";2017年北方工业大学优秀青年教师培养计划重点项目;2017年北方工业大学教育教学改革和课程建设研究重点项目

摘　　要：学术写作中的"我"是塑造出来的。相比西方语境,中国学者是从伦理和修辞方面来考虑人称问题。汉语中,"我"的形式"笔者"处于显身第一人称与隐身第三人称之间,以模拟第三人称的方式来表达自我。这种淡化主体的叙述方式,既有中国书写历史的作用,也有达成客观中立的科学效果的愿望。但在汉语学术经典中,学术作者并不讳言"我"。当代中国学术中"我"的淡出则主要源于权力的约束,现有科研发表体制的限制,以及学术功利化的结果。I was shaped in academic writings. Compared to western context, Chinese scholar understand personal pronoun from the ethical and rhetoric perspective. The author named Bizhe in Chinese between the first person and the third person, expresses himself by simulating tone of the third person. The way of fading out of the narrative subject has both the role of Chinese writing history and the desire to achieve objective and neutral scientific results. However, in the Chinese academic classics, academic authors did not hide themselves. Hiding even disappearance of I. is mainly due to the constraints of power, the limitations of the existing scientific research and publication system, and the results of academic utilitarianism.

关 键 词：学术 写作 我 自我 笔者 作者 主体 中国学术 

分 类 号：G304[文化科学]