鉴定意见质证实质化之建议  

The Recommendations on Substantive Nature of Expert Conclusion in the Cross-Examination

作　　者：叶俊尧 王均平[1] Ye Junyao;Wang Junping(Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China)

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学,湖北武汉430073

出　　处：《湖北警官学院学报》2018年第4期58-64,共7页Journal of Hubei University of Police

摘　　要：科学界定鉴定人出庭作证的情形、强化法官在裁判文书中对鉴定意见的说理、充分发挥法官在鉴定意见质证中的实质化作用,是鉴定意见质证实质化的重要措施。前者必须明确鉴定人出庭的条件和例外情形;中者必须落实鉴定人的知情权,保证鉴定意见在庭审中进行实质质证,确保交叉询问聚焦于鉴定意见本身;后者必须细化鉴定人拒不出庭作证的责任,确立法院对鉴定意见采纳情况的反馈机制及救济程序,加强司法行政部门和鉴定机构对鉴定人出庭能力的培训,保障鉴定人出庭作证时的合理便利。There are some important measures of substantive nature of expert conclusion such as the scientific definition of appraiser appearing in the court, strengthen the reasoning of judges in judgment documents, and give full play the role of substantive nature of expert conclusion for judges in the cross-examination. The former must clearly identify the conditions and exceptions of appraiser appearing in the court. The other must implement the right to know of appraiser, ensure that the expert conclusion carries out the substantive cross-examination during the trial, and also ensure that the cross-examination focuses on the expert conclusion itself. The latter must detail the responsibilities to appraiser who refuse to appear in the court, establish a feedback mechanism and relief procedures for the adoption of expert conclusion by the court, strengthen the ability training of appraiser appearing in the court from the judicial administrative department and appraisal institution, and ensure the reasonable convenience of appraiser appearing in the court.

关 键 词：鉴定意见 鉴定人 质证 交叉询问 出庭作证 出庭能力 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]