高校校规司法审查的类型分析与进路重构——基于近3年40起高校教育行政诉讼案件的实证研究  

Classification and Methods Restructuring of the Judicial Review of University Regulations——Based on the analysis of 40 cases in recent three years

作　　者：王霁霞[1] WANG Jixia(University of Science and Technology Beijing,Beijing 100083)

机构地区：[1]北京科技大学法律系,副教授北京100083

出　　处：《中国高教研究》2018年第9期58-63,共6页China Higher Education Research

基　　金：国家社会科学基金2017年度专项项目"国家治理体系和治理能力现代化"(17VZL010);北京科技大学青年教学骨干人才培养计划(2302014JXGGRC-002)的研究成果

摘　　要：2015年新《行政诉讼法》出台后,高校教育行政诉讼正式进入法院可以直接进行校规附带性审查的阶段。通过对40起涉及高校校规合法性问题的高校教育行政诉讼案件的分析,高校校规司法审查实践存在审查方式不统一、标准不一致、审查结果相互矛盾、司法克制过度等问题。应当区分不同类型、不同权力来源进行不同进路的审查:与学术、学位证相关校规的审查进路以形式审查和合目的性审查为主,并按离学术核心事项的远近区分不同密度的审查;处分、学籍管理等非学术性校规的审查进路遵循合法性审查原则。Since new Administrative Procedure Law was published in 2015, the legal disputes that between students and universities have entered a stage of incidental judicial review of the validity on university regulations. By analyzing 40 cases in recent three years, we have found that confusing review method, inconsistent standard, contradictory review results and excessive judicial restraint exist in the administrative proceedings in universities, thus we need to make reviews based on different methods regarding different types of power, that is,academic rules should be reviewed only on procedure, while nonacademic rules should be reviewed on legitimacy.

关 键 词：校规 附带性审查 合法性审查 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学] G647[政治法律—法学]