检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李祥 LI Xiang(Law School,People's Public Security University of China,Beijing 100038,China)
出 处:《辽宁警察学院学报》2018年第5期1-11,共11页Journal of Liaoning Police College
摘 要:我国自从2010年确立了一种"相对独立的量刑模式",这种模式本质上仍然是一种定罪与量刑一体化的模式。经过近八年的运行,相关诉讼程序和司法实践状况都发生了很大变化,庭审程序改革的迟滞使得这种模式呈现出它的不适应性。定罪程序与量刑程序不仅存在证据法基础上的不同,亦具有若干现实必要性。构建独立的量刑程序关键在于确保量刑信息收集的准确性和全面性,路径包括量刑信息调查主体和责任的明确、审判组织的专职化以及证明标准的重建等。Since 2010, we have founded a kind of relatively independent sentencing procedure. But essentially, it can be regarded as an integration of conviction and sentencing. After an operation of nearly eight years, related judicial proceedings and practice situations have changed a lot, but the reform of court procedure hasn’t started, which shows maladjustment. It is different on the proof of evidence law, but it has much practical significance as well to separate conviction procedure and sentencing procedure. The key of independent sentencing procedure is to ensure the accuracy and comprehensiveness of sentencing information. The ways include clearing subject of sentencing information sentencing information, specialization of trial group and rebuilding standard of testification.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7