独立的量刑程序改革新探  被引量:1

A New Research of Independent Sentencing Procedure Reform

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:李祥 LI Xiang(Law School,People's Public Security University of China,Beijing 100038,China)

机构地区:[1]中国人民公安大学法学院,北京100038

出  处:《辽宁警察学院学报》2018年第5期1-11,共11页Journal of Liaoning Police College

摘  要:我国自从2010年确立了一种"相对独立的量刑模式",这种模式本质上仍然是一种定罪与量刑一体化的模式。经过近八年的运行,相关诉讼程序和司法实践状况都发生了很大变化,庭审程序改革的迟滞使得这种模式呈现出它的不适应性。定罪程序与量刑程序不仅存在证据法基础上的不同,亦具有若干现实必要性。构建独立的量刑程序关键在于确保量刑信息收集的准确性和全面性,路径包括量刑信息调查主体和责任的明确、审判组织的专职化以及证明标准的重建等。Since 2010, we have founded a kind of relatively independent sentencing procedure. But essentially, it can be regarded as an integration of conviction and sentencing. After an operation of nearly eight years, related judicial proceedings and practice situations have changed a lot, but the reform of court procedure hasn’t started, which shows maladjustment. It is different on the proof of evidence law, but it has much practical significance as well to separate conviction procedure and sentencing procedure. The key of independent sentencing procedure is to ensure the accuracy and comprehensiveness of sentencing information. The ways include clearing subject of sentencing information sentencing information, specialization of trial group and rebuilding standard of testification.

关 键 词:无罪推定 证据规则 定罪程序 量刑信息 证明标准 

分 类 号:D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象