检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王嫱 吴昊 孟浩宇[1] 刘海雷 祝因苏[1] 许雪强[1] 贾坚 朱华渊 周蕾 Wang Qiang;Wu Hao;Meng Haoyu(The first affiliated hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing 210029,Jiangsu,China)
机构地区:[1]南京医科大学第一临床医学院,江苏南京210029
出 处:《中国高等医学教育》2018年第8期107-108,共2页China Higher Medical Education
基 金:2017年江苏省高等教育教改课题(2017JSJG184);2017年南京医科大学教育研究课题(ZD2017014;QN2017141);江苏省南京医科大学临床医学品牌建设专项(JX10216005)
摘 要:目的:探索TBL联合CBL教学法在3年住院医师规范化培训中的可行性。方法:以急性抬高性心肌梗死临床课程为教学内容,将住院医师随机分为实验教学组及传统教学组。课程结束后对两组教学效果评价。结果:在学习积极性、团队合作精神及临床分析能力方面实验教学组明显优于传统教学组,在理论成绩方面无显著差异。结论:TBL联合CBL教学法有利于提高住院医师学习的主动性及临床分析能力。Objective:To explore the feasibility of TBL combined CBL teaching method in the three-year resident standardization training. Methods The clinical course of acute elevation myocardial infarction was used as the teaching content. The resident doctors were randomly divid- ed into experimental teaching group and traditional teaching group. After the end of the course, the evaluation of the two groups of teaching ef- fects. Results The experimental teaching group was significantly better than the traditional teaching group in terms of learning enthusiasm, team- work spirit and clinical analysis ability, and there was no significant difference in theoretical scores. Conclusion TBL combined with CBL teach- ing method is beneficial to improve the initiative and clinical analysis ability of residents.
分 类 号:G642[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222