中国国际私法学的危机与变革  

The Crisis and Innovation of Chinese Private International Law

作　　者：何其生[1] He Qisheng

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院

出　　处：《政法论坛》2018年第5期68-84,共17页Tribune of Political Science and Law

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大研究课题“一带一路倡议与法律合作研究”(16JJD820009)中期成果之一

摘　　要：改革开放四十年来,中国制定了较为完善的国际私法法律体系,并创新了涉外民商事的审判实践。与之相适应,中国学者构建了有特色的国际私法理论体系,形成了一些有代表性的国际私法理论学说。然而,中国国际私法学存在着严重的学术危机：一是教材过剩,学术创新力不足;二是高水平学术论文的发表缺乏竞争力,在激烈竞争的中国法学界处于日益边缘化的角色;三是在大规模立法不复存在的情况下,＂立法中心主义＂的研究范式需要改变;四是中国国际私法学者的国际学术话语能力薄弱。危机的过程也是国际私法重现生机的过程。危机下的中国国际私法学应进行自我变革,培养学者自身和国际私法学术共同体的竞争力。具体来说：一是要从＂立法中心主义＂向以＂司法中心主义＂为主的多元研究范式转换;二是结合中国作为一个大国所力图塑造或推动的国际私法秩序,来探索未来世界结构中中国国际私法所可以描绘的理想图景;三是增强中国国际私法学者的国际学术话语能力,以加强中国作为世界大国的国际地位。In the past forty years of reform and opening up,China has improved its legal system of private international law,and innovated foreign-related trial mechanism in civil and commercial matters. Correspondingly,scholars have established the theoretical system of private international law with Chinese characteristics.Some representative theories have been formed. However,serious competitive crisis also exists in Chinese private international law as follows： First,overmuch textbooks mean lack of academic innovation; second,publication of papers in upscale journals lacks competitive ability,which leads Chinese private international law to play an increasingly marginalized role in the fierce competition of Chinese law circles; third,in consideration of the situation where large-scale legislation will not be in existence in China,the research paradigm of legislative centralism has to be changed; fourth,the international academic discourse ability of Chinese scholars in private international law is weak. The course of crisis is also the opportunity that makes Chinese private international law back to vitality. Chinese private international law needs self-help,and needs to improve the academic competitiveness of scholars and academic community of private international law. Specifically,the research paradigms need changes from legislative centralism to multiple paradigms,especially judicial centralism; the legal ambition prospect of Chinese private international law needs to be built up in connection with the structure of world order. More importantly,China should foster international academic discourse ability in correspondence with its status as a great power.

关 键 词：国际私法 学术危机 研究范式 学术竞争力 冲突法 

分 类 号：D997[政治法律—国际法学]