进步还是要素:中国职业教育发展哲学的犹豫与突破  

Progressivism or Essentialism: the Hesitation and Breakthrough of the Philosophy of China's Vocational Education Development

作　　者：陆俊杰 LU Jun-jie(Zhongyuan University of Technology,Zhengzhou 450007,China)

机构地区：[1]中原工学院党委宣传部,河南郑州450007

出　　处：《职教通讯》2018年第17期13-17,共5页Communication of Vocational Education

基　　金：全国教育科学规划课题2016年度教育学一般课题"制度有效性视角下我国高职教师职称评审制度的三足鼎立及现实选择研究"(项目编号:BJA160064)

摘　　要：进步主义和要素主义均是教育哲学中的重要流派。中国职业教育对进步主义的名义性秉持并不能消除理想照映下的难题,接受职业教育学生的基本素质堪忧、学校化职业教育模式依然使发展的实现出现困难。中国职业教育对要素主义的实质性传承也值得关注,要素主义在职业教育发展逻辑中的顽强生存,可以视为受批判而被使用的奇特图景。面向未来,马克思主义哲学以其发展性和完整性成为中国职业教育的最佳选择。根植于既往教育实践的教育哲学思想并不能完全适合于中国职业教育的当前实践,必须打造基于本土实践、具有中国特色的教育哲学思想。Both Progressivism and Essentialism are important schools of education philosophy. The nominal adherenceof China＇s vocational education to progressivism cannot eliminate the problems under the ideal expectations.The basic quality of vocational education students is worrying, and the school-based vocational educationmodel still makes it difficult to realize the ideal of Progressivism. The substantive inheritance of Essentialism inChina＇s vocational education is also worthy of attention. The tenacious survival of Essentialism in the logic of thedevelopment of vocational education can be regarded as a peculiar picture that Essentialism is used but criticized.In the future, Marxist Philosophy has become the best choice for vocational education in China because ofits developmental and integrity. The philosophy of education rooted in past educational practice is not entirelysuitable for the current practice of China’s vocational education. It is necessary to create an educational philosophybased on local practice and with Chinese characteristics.

关 键 词：中国职业教育发展 进步主义 要素主义 哲学 技术积累 

分 类 号：G710[文化科学—职业技术教育学]