检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谭建川[1] TAN Jianchuan(School of Foreign Languages,International and Comparative Education Research Center,Southwest University,Chongqing 400715)
机构地区:[1]西南大学外国语学院、国际与比较教育研究所,重庆400715
出 处:《比较教育研究》2018年第11期106-112,共7页International and Comparative Education
基 金:日本国际交流基金会2017年度“日本研究·知的交流”访学项目(项目号:29RE026)的阶段性成果
摘 要:2008年和2013年,日本政府相继公布了两期《教育振兴基本计划》。该计划重提"教育立国"口号,为未来日本的教育改革确定了基本目标和具体措施。不过,该计划无论从制定方式、核心理念,还是具体的改革措施,都存在不少问题,因此广为日本各界人士所质疑和批评。就实质而言,日本的《教育振兴基本计划》受到国家整体改革的指导思想和基本路线的影响,以新保守主义和新自由主义的立场来指导教育改革,并未客观而完整地反映出教育体系内在因素的现实状况和改善需求,这表现出现阶段日本教育发展的困境,也显示出日本教育改革的复杂性。In 2008 and 2013, the Japanese government published two Basic Plans for the Promotion of Education. The plan resumes the slogan of"Educational Establishment", defining the basic goals and specific measures for the future education reform in Japan. However, because the plan has many problems in the way of making, the core idea and the specific measures, it is widely questioned and criticized by people from all circles. In essence, the"Basic Plan"is impacted by the guiding ideology and the basic theory of the country's overall reform, Neo-conservatism and Neo-liberalism, thus failing to reflect the internal factors of education system and the development requirements objectively and completely. This shows the predicament of educational development in Japan, on the other hand it also suggests the complexity in Japanese education reforms.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7