文学人类学的学科反思与学术开拓——读《20世纪前期中国文学人类学实践研究》劄记  

Disciplinary Reflection and Academic Exploration of Literary Anthropology——Reading Notes on the Practical Study of Chinese Literature Anthropology in the Early 20th Century

作　　者：陈金星 CHEN Jin-xing(School of Chinese Language and Literature,Minnan Normal University,Zhangzhou 363000,Fujian,China)

机构地区：[1]闽南师范大学文学院,福建漳州363000

出　　处：《兰州文理学院学报（社会科学版）》2018年第6期103-108,共6页Journal of Lanzhou University of Arts and Science(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：20世纪前期中国文学人类学的思想渊源是西方的古典人类学理论与中国传统学术的"礼失而求诸野"思想及"金石证史"观念。在国学研究中,文学人类学先驱结合传世文献、出土文物以及人类学资料与理论展开大胆探讨,孙作云提出的"三层证明法"是"三重证据法"的先声。《20世纪前期中国文学人类学实践研究》通过精确的问题把握、扎实的资料梳理、细致的个案分析系统考察了学科先驱的学术实践,推进了学科反思与学术开拓。The ideological origin of Chinese literary anthropology in the early 20 th century was the Western classical anthropology theory and the traditional Chinese academic thought of＂losing courtesy and seeking for all fields＂and the concept of＂history of gold and stone evidence＂.In the study of sinology,the pioneers of literary anthropology carried out bold discussions in combination with handed down literature,unearthed cultural relics,and anthropological data and theories.The＂three-layer proof method＂proposed by Sun Zuoyun is the precursor of the＂triple evidence method＂.The Practical Study of Chinese Literature Anthropology in the Early20 th Centuryexamined the academic practices of discipline pioneers through accurate problem grasp,solid data combing,and detailed case analysis systems,and promoted academic reflection and academic exploration.

关 键 词：文学人类学 古典人类学 三重证据法 学科反思 

分 类 号：I206.7[文学—中国文学]