检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:费伦茨·费赫尔 王秀敏(译)[2] Written by Ferenc Feher ;Translated by Wang Xiumin(College of Marxism Studies,Harbin Normal University,Harbin 150025,China)
机构地区:[1]不详 [2]哈尔滨师范大学马克思主义学院,哈尔滨150025
出 处:《学术交流》2018年第10期5-12,共8页Academic Exchange
基 金:国家社科基金后期资助项目“阿格妮丝·赫勒政治哲学的现代性逻辑和民主诉求”(17FKS024)
摘 要:在国内学术界中对卢卡奇和本雅明以及他们思想之间进行比较的作品并不多见,而费赫尔早在20世纪80年代写的这篇文章则对两者及其思想进行了深刻而细致的比较。首先,费赫尔详细阐述了两人思想间有意与无意的交汇,认为卢卡奇的《小说理论》和《悲剧的形而上学》对本雅明的悲苦剧产生了重要的影响,这是两人思想间有意的交汇;而无意的交汇则在于本雅明的悲苦剧与他并不知道的卢卡奇的一篇题为《"浪漫体裁"的美学》的德文手稿中谈论的非悲剧性的戏剧相似。其次,费赫尔又比较了两人思想的差别,洞察到了两人思想中存在的悖论。最后,费赫尔用普鲁塔克(Plutarch)的方式比较和归纳两人共同的特征:两人都是著名的"独立知识分子"群体中典型的和自觉的样本,都对知识分子救赎的或者弥赛亚的角色有坚定的初始信仰,都是评论家。总的来说,这篇清晰易懂的文章为深入研究卢卡奇和本雅明的思想提供了宝贵的资料,同时其比较的手法和视角也为学术写作提供了独特的方法。There are few works that aim to compare Lukacs, Benjamin and their thoughts in the domestic academic circles, while these articles written by Feher in the 1980s made a deep and detailed comparison between them and their thoughts. Firstly, Feher elaborated on the deliberate and unconscious intercourse of their thoughts, believed that Novel Theory and Tragic Metaphysics written by Lukacs had an important influence on Benjamin's tragic drama, which was the deliberate exchange of their thoughts, while the unintentional exchange was in Benjamin's tragic drama and Lukacs's German manuscript, which he did not know, entitled Aesthetics of Romantic Style concerning the non-tragic dramatic similarities. Secondly, Feher compared the differences between the two minds and examined the paradox in the two person's thinking. Finally, Feher compared and summarized their common characteristics in the way of Plutarch: they were both typical and self- conscious samples of the well-known "independent intellectuals", both of them had firm initial beliefs in the redemption of intellectuals or the role of Messiah, and they were critics. Generally speaking, this clear and easy-to-understand article provides valuable information for the in-depth study of Lukacs' and Benjamin's ideas, and its comparative techniques and perspectives also gives a unique method for academic writing.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229