词义生成的两种阐释方式——维特根斯坦和利奇的一个比较  

Two Different Ways of Interpretating Sense Generation

作　　者：鲁苓[1] 

机构地区：[1]海南大学英语系 海口570228

出　　处：《山东外语教学》2002年第3期21-23,共3页Shandong Foreign Language Teaching

摘　　要：迄今为止，语言哲学家维特根斯坦提出的“意义即使用”的观念仍是具影响力的意义观，其核心观念就是不能脱离具体使用环境讨论词的意义。然而，英国语言学家利奇认为，维特根斯坦上述思想和观念过于空泛而无法进行分析和论证，因而难以确认其是否合理。为此，他提出了新的“语境－意义”分析模式。笔者认为，上述两种阐释方式都值得认真关注和思考。Up to now, the idea 'meaning is use' made by the linquistic phylosopher L.Wttigenstein is still one of the most important and influential concepts of meaaning. But the British linquistist G.N. Leech thinks differently. He considers that this concept is too vague and general to be reasonable. So he puts forward his own analysing model. This paper attempts to compare these two ways of interpretation and thinks that both ways are expected to be valuable.

关 键 词：词义生成 阐释方式 维特根斯坦 利奇 语境 语言哲学 语义学 

分 类 号：H030[语言文字—语言学] H0-05