大学生人格、应对方式对主观幸福感的影响  

Influence on Subjective Well-Being of College Students Imposed by Personality and Coping Styles

作　　者：姜涛[1] 刘鹤 

机构地区：[1]牡丹江师范学院教师教育学院,黑龙江牡丹江157011 [2]漠河北极镇中心校,黑龙江漠河165303

出　　处：《牡丹江师范学院学报（社会科学版）》2016年第5期120-124,共5页Journal of Mudanjiang Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：黑龙江省教育科学"十二五"规划青年专项(GJD1215072);牡丹江师范学院科研服务地方专项项目(FD201603)

摘　　要：以225名大学生为被试,采用问卷调查的方法,考察大学生人格、应对方式和主观幸福感的基本情况,及其之间相互的关系。研究表明:人格的精神质维度在年级上有差异;大学生的应对方式在性别、家庭结构和学科上有差异;大学生的总体幸福感在性别和学科上存在差异;人格中,外倾性和掩饰度两个维度与主观幸福感总分有显著正相关,精神质和神经质两个维度与主观幸福感总分有负相关;应对方式中,解决问题和求助两个因子与主观幸福感总分有显著正相关,自责、幻想、退避和合理化四个因子与主观幸福感总分有显著负相关。通过回归分析,精神质、解决问题和自责,三个预测变量对主观幸福感的联合解释变异量为27.9%。Personality, coping styles? subjective well-being and relations among them were studied with questionnaire according to 225 college students as subjects. The results showed that psychic dimensionality of personality was different among several grades. Coping styles of the students were different between genders, among families and subjects. Happiness of the college students in general was different between genders? among subjects. Subjective well-being was positive correlative obviously with extroversion and concealing degree? negative correlative obviously with psychoticism and nervousness of personality.Subjective well-being was positive correlative obviously with solving problem and seeking help? negative correlative obviously with four factors including self-accusation, fantasy? retreat and rationalization of all coping styles. Amount of variation to account for subjective well-bein together from three predictive variables including psychoticism? solving problem and self-accusation was 27. 9% by analysis of regression.

关 键 词：主观幸福感 人格 应对方式 大学生 

分 类 号：B832[哲学宗教—美学]