“大贫小贫”:孙中山论近代中国劳资关系  

"Great Poverty and Little Poverty" : Sun Yat-sen's Argument on the Relationship between Laborers and Capitalists in Modern China

作　　者：彭贵珍[1] Peng Guizhen

机构地区：[1]江西中医药大学马克思主义学院,江西南昌330004

出　　处：《科教文汇》2018年第7期165-167,192,共4页Journal of Science and Education

基　　金：教育部人文社科项目"南京国民政府劳资争议调处政策研究"(项目批准号:13YJA770024)的研究成果

摘　　要：孙中山的"大贫小贫"论开启了近代中国"劳资合作"理论的滥觞。孙中山一再强调中国经济落后,大家是清一色的穷;中国没有大资本家;中国工人与资本家的区别,只是"大贫和小贫"的差别;中国工人和资本家同受帝国主义的经济压迫,中国工人要求得自身解放,必须投身国民革命;民生主义应当"一面图工商业的发达,一面图工人经济生活的安全幸福"。孙中山刻意抹杀中国劳资之间的阶级差异虽然存在着不符合中国实情的因素,但作为政治家,他牢牢抓住了近代中国的主要矛盾,自觉认识到了近代中国面临的首要任务是推翻帝国主义的侵略,国民党应当领导包括劳动者和资本家在内的各阶级力量,实现民族独立。Sun Yat-sen's argument of"great poverty and little poverty"opened the beginning of labor-capital cooperation theory in modern China.Sun Yat-sen stressed such opinions repeatedly:China's economy is outdated and we are all poor,there was no big capitalist in China,the difference between Chinese workers and capitalists was"great poverty and little poverty",Chinese workers and capitalists were subject to the imperialist economic oppression,Chinese workers must join the national revolution if they wanted to liberate themselves.On the people's livelihood theory,we must seek the safety and happiness of workers when we develop the industry and commerce.Although there were some factors that didn't conform to China's reality,when Sun Yat-sen deliberately denied the class differences between China's laborers and capitalists,as a politician,he firmly grasped the major contradictions in modern China,consciously realized that the primary task of modern Chinese was to overthrow the imperialists'aggression,the Kuomintang should lead the various forces including laborers and capitalists to achieve national indepen dence.

关 键 词：劳动者 资本家 “大贫小贫” 劳资合作 

分 类 号：F249.27[经济管理—劳动经济]