“双一流”背景下高校潜力学科评价研究——以南京航空航天大学物理学学科为例  

Research on the Potential Disciplines in the Universities Under the Background of “Double First-rate”: Taking the Physics Discipline from Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics as an Example

作　　者：陈长华 秦萍[1] CHEN Chang-hua;QIN Ping(Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing 211106,China)

机构地区：[1]南京航空航天大学,211106

出　　处：《大学图书情报学刊》2018年第3期108-114,124,共8页Journal of Academic Library and Information Science

摘　　要：在"双一流"建设背景下,学科评价日益受到关注,越来越多的高校图书馆开始利用Incites、ESI等资源,为高校相关部门、院系提供基于文献计量指标的学科评价服务。物理学是南京航空航天大学目前距离ESI门槛值最近的学科,文章以近十年(2007年至今)Web of Science、Incites、ESI数据库中物理学学科的论文为分析对象,从论文数量、被引频次、学科规范化的引文影响力、国际合作论文比、高被引论文数、h指数、Q1期刊论文百分比、合作机构等方面对该学科的发展态势、学科潜力进行分析。探索学科发展分析与预测的新方法,促进图书馆更好地适应"双一流"建设的需要,实现图书馆学科服务的拓展与创新。Under the background of the construction of“Double First-rate”,the discipline evaluation is drawing more and more attention.More and more university libraries are beginning to use the resources such as Incites and ESI to provide the academic evaluation service based on bibliometric indexes for the departments of colleges and universities.Physics is the closest discipline to the ESI threshold in NUAA.The study is based on physics discipline papers from the Web of Science,Incites and ESI databases in the past decade(2007 to date),and from the aspects of the number of papers,cited frequency,normalized cited influence,percentage of international cooperation papers,the number of highly cited papers,h index,percentage of journal articles in Q1,the cooperation mechanism,the paper makes an analysis of the discipline development momentum,and the academic potential of physics and explores the new method of subject development analysis and prediction to promote the library to better adapt to the needs of“Double First-rate”construction,and to realize the development and innovation of library discipline service.

关 键 词：双一流 物理学 学科评价 学科潜力 ESI 

分 类 号：G353.1[文化科学—情报学]