检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘浩[1] LIU Hao(Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学,北京100875
出 处:《北京警察学院学报》2018年第2期18-24,共7页Journal of Beijing Police College
摘 要:在经济犯罪侦查高证据要求与侦查手段尚未完备的矛盾下,经济犯罪侦查实践中自发产生了具有"立案交易"性质的行为,也引发了一些问题。本文通过对比研究,提出了"立案交易"的初步概念,就经济犯罪侦查中"立案交易"适用的理论基础与法律依据进行探讨,明晰了当前经济犯罪侦查实践中适用"立案交易"的主要困境,并有针对性地从明晰适用原则、明确行为效力、完善适用规范、健全监督机制等方面提出了初步建议。Under the contradiction between the high requirement of economic criminal evidence and the press of method being not yet complete,there is the means which seems like“Bargaining of Putting on Record”in investigation practice producing spontaneously.Through the comparative study,this paper puts forward the preliminary conception of“Bargaining of Putting on Record”and discusses the theoretical basis and the legal basis of it in the economic crime investigation.At the same time,this paper clarifies the dilemma of economic crime investigation practice for“Bargaining of Putting on Record”currently,and pertinently puts forward some preliminary proposals from the aspects of clearing principles,defining behavior effect,improving applicable codes and the supervision mechanism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13