刑事辩护权利的解释原理  

The Principles of Interpretation of the Criminal Defense Right

作　　者：黄士元[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学法学院

出　　处：《中外法学》2018年第2期455-471,共17页Peking University Law Journal

摘　　要：刑事诉讼法的规范内容极为复杂,这些性质上明显不同的规范在解释方法上也有不同之处。其中,对辩护权利规范的解释,应禁止不利于被追诉人的扩大解释、类推解释,不禁止在必要且适当时作有利于被追诉人的扩大解释、类推解释。结合公民权利的开放性原则、霍菲尔德的权利类型理论、德国法学理论中的"基本权利的功能体系"对各项具体辩护权利进行类型化分析,不仅有助于更清晰地理解不同类型的辩护权利在解释上的不同之处,还有助于澄清当前关于辩护权利所存在的一些认识上的谬误。在对具体辩护权利进行解释时,解释者应注意保持法条之间的协调,应将对法条的解释置于法律原则、法学理论、后果考量、司法实践所形成的场域之中。The content of the Criminal Procedure Law is very complicated and there are diverse ap-proaches for interpretation.For the interpretation of the defense right,extensive and analogical interpre-tations against defense should be discouraged,and extensive and analogical interpretation in favor of de-fense is acceptable when it is necessary and just.Classifying defense right into four categories by combi-ning the principle of“what is not prohibited is permitted”,Hohfeld'typology of right,with the func-tional system of the fundamental rights,helps us to understand the difference of interpretation between the distinct categories of defense right and clarify the common fallacies in the current analysis of defense right.Interpreters should keep their interpretation both in harmony with the other articles of law and in compliance with relevant principles,legal theories,and judicial practice.

关 键 词：辩护权利 解释原理 类型化 司法实践 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]