阐释学视角下《茵梦湖》三个中译本对比研究分析  

A Comparative Study of Three Chinese Versions of Immensee from the Perspective of Hermeneutics

作　　者：李新凤 Li Xinfeng

机构地区：[1]山东大学外国语学院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《现代语文》2018年第7期140-145,共6页Modern Chinese

摘　　要：随着翻译研究的不断深入,学者们从不同的角度,用不同的理论方法来探究与文学翻译相关的现象和问题。伽达默尔阐释学的三大哲学原则,即"理解的历史性""视域融合""效果历史"对文学翻译产生了很大影响。研究的文本来自德国著名诗意现实主义小说家特奥尔多·施笃姆的重要代表作品《茵梦湖》的三个中译本。通过对比分析郭沫若、巴金和杨武能三个中文译本,证明伽达默尔阐释学的三大哲学原则对文化翻译的指导价值和借鉴意义。With the deepening of translation studies,scholars use different theoretical methods to explore the phenomena and problems related to literary translation from different perspectives.The three major philosophical principles of Gadamer's hermeneutics,namely,the“history of understanding”,the“convergence of horizons”,and the“effect history”have a great influence on literary translation.The texts studied in this article come from the three Chinese translations of the famous representative works of German poetic realist novelist Theodor Storm,Immensee.By comparing the three Chinese translations of Guo Moruo,Ba Jin and Yang Wuneng,we can prove the guiding value and reference significance of the three major philosophical principles of Gadamer's Hermeneutics for cultural translation.

关 键 词：阐释学 三大哲学原则 茵梦湖 对比分析 

分 类 号：H33[语言文字—德语] I046[文学—文学理论]