检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡平[1] HU Ping(School of economics and management,Zhejiang Business Technology Institute,Ningbo 315012,China)
机构地区:[1]浙江工商职业技术学院经管学院,浙江宁波315012
出 处:《宁波大学学报(人文科学版)》2018年第5期104-110,共7页Journal of Ningbo University:Liberal Arts Edition
基 金:浙江省科技厅项目"浙江省‘大众创业;万众创新’的关键问题;评价体系及推进路径研究"(2017C35071)
摘 要:基于中国高技术产业统计年鉴面板数据,比较外资企业与内资企业协同创新影响因素的差别,研究结果表明:企业的发展战略决定了对协同创新的定位不同,外资企业更注重发展壮大,而内资企业更注重提高研发的核心竞争力,从而导致外资企业利润水平和发展速度与协同创新水平正相关,而内资企业负相关;政府研发经费对内资企业协同创新的弹性系数为正,而与外资企业的协同创新无关;企业规模对内资企业协同创新的弹性系数为正,对外资企业的弹性系数为较大的负数。Based on the data of Chinese high-tech Statistical Yearbook,the paper compares the influencing factors of enterprise collaborative innovation differences between foreign enterprises and domestic enterprises.The study shows that the development strategy of the enterprise determines the different positioning of collaborative innovation and foreign investment enterprises put more emphasis on the development and expansion while domestic enterprises pay more attention to improve the core competitiveness of research and development.This makes the level of foreign profits&development speed and the level of collaborative innovation positively correlated,while domestic enterprise is on the opposite.Government R&D funding for domestic enterprises collaborative innovation elasticity coefficient is positive related while it has no relations with the foreign collaborative innovation.Enterprise-scale for domestic enterprises collaborative innovation elasticity coefficient is positive while foreign investment enterprises elasticity coefficient is the larger negative.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28