公诉职能与刑事审判监督职能适度分离探析  

Analysis of moderate separation between public prosecution function and criminal trial supervision function

作　　者：吴海伦[1] Wu Hailun(Shenyang Municipal People’s Procuratorate,Shenyang Liaoning 110007,China)

机构地区：[1]辽宁省沈阳市人民检察院,辽宁沈阳110007

出　　处：《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》2018年第5期94-98,共5页Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice

摘　　要：公诉职能与刑事审判监督职能的非完全兼容性决定了两者在运行机制上具备各自的规律特点。长期以来,传统公诉工作将两者混同的做法不仅受到多方质疑,也影响了工作效果。在司法体制改革背景下,检察机关应以内设机构改革为契机,按照专业性要求重新整合配置职能,把握好两者分离与衔接的尺度,以建立抗诉案件"双重审查"机制为核心,适应"以审判为中心"的诉讼格局,并推动"繁简分流"的公诉工作新趋势。The incomplete compatibility between the public prosecution function and the criminal trial supervision function determines that the two have their own regular characteristics in the operational mechanism.For a long time,the practice of confusing the two in the traditional public prosecution work has not only been questioned by many parties,but also affected the work effect.Under the background of the reform of the judicial system,the procuratorial organs should take the reform of the internal institutions as an opportunity,re-integrate the allocation functions according to the professional requirements,grasp the scale of separation and convergence between the two,and establish the core of“double review”mechanism for protest cases to adapt to the“trial-centered”litigation pattern and to promote the new trend of public prosecution work of“separation between simplification and diversion”.

关 键 词：公诉 刑事审判监督 分离 衔接 

分 类 号：DF738[政治法律—诉讼法学]