论复社对竟陵派的诗学批评与接受  

Comments on Fu Society's Poetic Criticism and Acceptance of Jingling School

作　　者：曾肖[1] ZENG Xiao(The School of Liberal Arts, JiNan university,Guang Zhou 510632)

机构地区：[1]暨南大学文学院,广东广州510632

出　　处：《玉溪师范学院学报》2018年第10期8-15,共8页Journal of Yuxi Normal University

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(暨南跨越计划)"<事林广记>与宋金元明社会研究"(项目编号:15JNKY005)资助

摘　　要：明末竟陵派的崛起和《诗归》的风行,引发了各种批评议论。张溥领导的江南复社成员对待竟陵派的态度复杂而微妙:既有肯定、揄扬之举,亦有刻意的区别或有意的避开。陈子龙等人的几社、吴应箕等人的南社崇尚雅正,力图廓清竟陵诗风。闻启祥、严调御等杭州的复社成员对竟陵派的态度亦有友好之处,与谭元春多有诗歌酬唱。总的来说,江淮等地的复社人士承认竟陵派在诗坛上的宗主地位,但不满竟陵取径狭、立论偏、求新异的诗学主张和诗歌倾向。The rise of Jingling School in the late Ming Dynasty and its popularity of poetry aroused all kinds of criticism. Firstly, the members of Fu Society led by Zhang Pu in the south of the Yangtse River treated Jingling School with a complex and delicate attitude: affirmation and praise, and deliberate distinction or avoidance. Besides, Ji Society by Chen Zilong et al and Nan Society by Wu Yingji et al advocated elegant poetry and tried to clear the poetic style of Jingling, while Wen Qixiang, Yan Diaoyu and other members of Fu Society in Hangzhou were friendly with Jingling School but in the poetic chorus with Tan Yuanchun. Overall, the members of Fu Society in Jianghuai acknowledged the poetic leadership of Jingling School in the poetry world, but discontented their poetic opinion and tendency which were novel but narrow.

关 键 词：竟陵派 江淮 复社 几社 张溥 

分 类 号：I109.9[文学—世界文学]