检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张薇[1] ZHANG Wei(China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China)
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学,北京100088
出 处:《广西政法管理干部学院学报》2018年第6期92-99,共8页Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
摘 要:对检察机关在公益诉讼中面临的"检察监督权"的设置、检察权对行政权的介入以及行政公益诉讼中的司法审查等现实困境进行探究,提出行政公益诉讼中检察权、行政权以及司法权三者相互交织产生的现实问题与矛盾。关于行政公益诉讼制度的诉讼目的、公益救济标准以及诉讼类型等问题的厘清是直面实践中行政公益诉讼制度在现实中难以实质性发挥效力的理论前提。同时,从诉讼运行过程的视角分别从诉前阶段、诉中阶段以及审理程序对于完善我国行政公益诉讼制度提出了可行性方案。This paper explores the establishment of the procuratorial supervision power in the public interest litigation,the procuratorial power to intervene in administrative power and the judicial dilemma in administrative public interest litigation,put forward the practical problems and contradictions arising from the interweaving of procuratorial power,administrative power and judicial power in administrative public interest litigation. The clarification of the litigation purpose,public welfare relief standards and litigation types of the administrative public interest litigation system is a theoretical premise that the administrative public interest litigation system is difficult to be effective in reality. At the same time,from the perspective of litigation operation process,the pre-suiting stage,the middle stage of the lawsuit and the trial procedure are proposed to improve the administrative public interest litigation system in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3