微信在《流行病学》教学中的应用研究  

作　　者：王耶盈 尚晓丽[2] 陈莹 和丽梅 常巍 肖媛媛 喻箴 李永霞[3] 

机构地区：[1]昆明医科大学公共卫生学院,云南昆明650500 [2]昆明医科大学附属儿童医院,云南昆明650228 [3]昆明医科大学第二附属医院,云南昆明650101

出　　处：《高教学刊》2019年第7期62-64,共3页Journal of Higher Education

基　　金：昆明医科大学教研教改课题基金资助项目"智能手机在非预防医学专业流行病学教学中的应用--专业针对性实例教学"(编号:2017-JY-Y-019)

摘　　要：目的:探索利用微信平台对非预防医学专业本科生进行《流行病学》专业针对性教学的可能性,为《流行病学》教学方式提供一定的参考依据。方法:采用简单随机和整群抽样的方法,确定对照组与实验组。对照组予传统教学方式;实验组在传统教学基础上,利用微信平台于课前、课后推送相关章节重点知识及专业针对性的科研论文。使用已设计好的"教学效果评价表"及期末考试卷面成绩作为教学效果评价指标。结果:220名学生完成了本次研究,其中对照组109人,实验组111人。《流行病学》期末考试卷面成绩实验组(80.41±10.04)显著优于对照组(77.71±10.56)。实验组同学在科研兴趣的提升、科研方法及过程的了解、认识科研严谨性方面均与对照组存在统计学差异(P<0.05)。质疑能力、解决问题能力、创新能力、逻辑思维能力方面实验组均显著优于对照组(P<0.05)。但科研实践信心在两组间却未显示出统计学差异(P=0.276)。结论:利用微信平台对非预防医学专业本科生进行《流行病学》专业针对性教学取得了良好效果。该方法可有效提高学生成绩,提升一定的科研能力,但缺乏在现场研究的生产实习,从而在科研信心方面未得到明显提升。Objectives: To explore the possibility of using WeChat as a toll in the teaching of Epidemiology among undergraduates majored in non-preventive medicine. Methods: Simple sampling and cluster sampling methods were adopted to identify experimental group and control group among undergraduates majored in non-preventive medicine in a certain medical university. The control group was given the traditional lecture of Epidemiology. The experimental group used the WeChat platform to push relevant key knowledge and professional research papers before and after class. Constructed questionnaire and final examine score were used as evaluation indicators of teaching effect. Results: A total of 220 students completed the study, 109 in the control group and 111 in the experimental group. The scores of the final examination of Epidemiology in the experimental group (80.41±10.04) were significantly higher than those in the control group (77.71±10.56). There were significant differences between the experimental group and the control group in terms of the promotion of scientific research interest, the understanding of scientific research methods and processes, and the understanding of scientific research rigor (P < 0.05). Questioning ability, problem solving ability, innovation ability and logical thinking ability of the experimental group were significantly better than those of the control group (P < 0.05). However, there was no statistical difference in the confidence of scientific research practice between the two groups (P=0.276). Conclusion: The teaching effect of Epidemiology on non-preventive undergraduates is good. It can effectively improve students' achievement and scientific research ability. However, it lacks the whole scientific research process under the actual situation, so the confidence in scientific research has not been significantly improved.

关 键 词：流行病学 微信 非预防医学专业 本科 

分 类 号：G642[文化科学—高等教育学]