检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高蕾 张净银 GAO Lei;JANG Jyung-Eun
机构地区:[1]同济大学马克思主义学院 [2]韩国京畿女子高中
出 处:《天津师范大学学报(基础教育版)》2019年第2期29-33,共5页Journal of Tianjin Normal University(Elementary Education Edition)
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目"不同社会群体利益诉求和思想状况调查研究"(14ZDA059);中国博士后基金"中韩生态素养教育比较研究"(2018M642069)
摘 要:应用科学素养三维评价框架,对中国和韩国最新颁布的小学科学课程标准进行比较分析,发现韩国科学课程在科学思考习惯等方面的内容比我国多,但在科学的价值观和理解科学本质这两方面的内容要求低于我国的科学课程。反映了两国对科学素养的重视和在培养面对未来挑战人才时的不同取径。Based on the existing framework of scientific literacy,this paper makes a comparative analysis of the latest curriculum standards for science subjects in primary schools issued by China and South Korea in 2017 and 2015.The results show that both China and South Korea have morecommon scientific thinking habits followed by scientific values and the least understanding of the nature of science.Among them,the thinking habits men.tioned in South Korean curriculum are more than those in China’s curriculum.On the other hand,scientific values and understanding of the nature of science in China’s curriculum are more than those in South Korea’s especially at the level of information processing ability in the same period of curriculum reform.The findings of the compara.tive analysis reflect that our country attaches the importance to the cultivation of scientific literacy when facing fu.ture challenges.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117