刑事推定的合理性与价值--兼对审前“推定方案”的证成  

Rationality and Value of Criminal Presumption: Committed to the Pre-trial “Presumption Plan”

作　　者：杨佶欣 YANG Ji-xin

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学,上海200333

出　　处：《四川警察学院学报》2018年第6期19-26,共8页Journal of Sichuan Police College

基　　金：最高人民检察院理论研究课题《以证据为核心的刑事指控体系构建》(JL2017Z01)

摘　　要：刑事审前程序完善,尤其是办案中取证、认知方式改进,实务中"推定方案"的合理性有待证明,完善进路有待提出。其实,应将推定制度统辖在"证据裁判"的大背景下进行解读、规划,并追求其规范化、程序化、理性化的理论方向和实践路径。传统解读存在忽视域外现实、历史起源、实践需求的偏颇。推定制度是符合"证据裁判主义"本质的,其以程序外观为保障,且具备自由心证思维;其亦可以倒逼审前"证据裁判"意识,推动审前认知模式的革新,利于刑事诉讼的情理推断模式之形成,也是司法推动主义的臂膀之一。当然,还需进一步解构当前理论,明确其程序外观具体应然状态,分析其司法体制改革背景。The approaches to perfecting pre-trial procedures need exploring,including how to improvement evidence obtainment and cognitive style in handling cases,how to prove rationality of presumption plan in practice.In fact,the presumption system should be put into the background of evidence referee to make interpretation and plan,finding the theoretical and practical path of standardization,proceduralization and rationalization.Traditional interpretation has the bias of ignoring extraterritorial reality,historical origin,and practical needs.Presumption system is in line with the essence of evidence refereeism,which is guaranteed by procedure,and has thinking of free evaluation of evidence.It can also stimulate the pre-trial evidence referee consciousness,promote the innovation of pre-trial cognitive mode,and facilitate the formation of the rational inference model of litigation.Of course,it is necessary to further deconstruct the current theory,clarify the specific appearance of its procedures,and analyze the background of judicial system reform.

关 键 词：证据裁判主义 刑事推定 合理性 审前程序 

分 类 号：DF73[政治法律—诉讼法学]