《黄侃手批<尔雅义疏>》之“反训”辨误  

Research on the Errors of "Fanxun" in Huang Kan's Annotation of Erya Yishu

作　　者：张子帆 ZHANG Zi-fan(College of Chinese Language and Literature,Wuhan University,Wuhan Hubei 430072,China)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学文学院,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《齐齐哈尔大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2019年第3期112-114,共3页Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：黄侃先生批注《尔雅义疏》提出了"相反为训"的观点并论证了十数例反训字。笔者前文《黄侃手批<尔雅义疏>所见"相反为训"》认为"反训"不可信,更非训诂条例,一词兼有相反二义一般也不存在。本文在前文基础上增补六则例证。Huang Kan put forward the idea of "Xiangfanweixun" in the process of annotation of Erya Yishu and proved more than a dozen examples. The paper,A Study on Huang Kan's annotation of Erya Yishu,proved that "Fanxun" and "two opposite meanings in a word" are both wrong. His mistakes can be divided into five categories. Based on the previous paper,this paper proves six examples.

关 键 词：黄侃手批 《尔雅义疏》 反训 辨误 

分 类 号：H109.2[语言文字—汉语]