大学工科实验教学考核方法改革与实践  

作　　者：田禾[1,2] 党璐 周世敏 

机构地区：[1]天津理工大学天津市先进机电系统设计与智能控制重点实验室,天津300384 [2]机电工程国家级实验教学示范中心(天津理工大学),天津300384 [3]天津纽伯恩新能源科技有限公司,天津300384

出　　处：《高教学刊》2019年第10期139-141,共3页Journal of Higher Education

基　　金：天津理工大学教学基金项目"项目驱动教学模式在能源动力类专业实验教学中的应用"(编号:ZD16-03);天津市大学生创新训练计划项目"基于多能耦合冷热电联供系统的智慧能源管控平台研究"(编号:201810060059);2018年天津市企业科技特派员

摘　　要：针对大学工科传统实验考核方法对学生实验过程无法全面评价以及评分标准主要依赖于教师的主观认知等缺点,对能源动力类实验课程的考核方法进行了改革。在确立考核目标和原则的基础上,通过例如增大平时实验成绩比例、细化平时成绩考核标准、量化期末实验操作考核评分标准、设置设计性实验加分环节和评分标准等多种手段改进实验考核方法。实践表明,实验考核方法的改革使实验课程的考核真正起到"以考促教,以考促学"的作用,从而提高了实验教学质量。In view of the shortcomings of the traditional experimental assessment methods, such as the inability of comprehensive evaluation of students undefined experimental process and the fact that the scoring standard mainly depends on the subjective cognition of teachers, the assessment method of the energy-driven experiment course is reformed. On the basis of establishing the assessment objectives and principles, by increasing the ratio of ordinary experiment results, refining the ordinary performance assessment standards and quantifying the final experimental operation assessment scoring standards, Set up the design experiment adding link and the scoring standard and so on many kinds of means to improve the experiment examination method. The practice shows that the reform of the experimental examination method makes the examination of the experimental course really play the role of "promoting teaching by examination and promoting learning by examination", thus improving the quality of experimental teaching.

关 键 词：考核方法 实验教学 高等教育 工科 

分 类 号：C642[社会学]