道德的三种理解形式:一种关于认识理路的评析  

Three Kinds of Understanding Forms of Morality: An Analysis of the Way of Understanding

作　　者：刘文[1] LIU Wen(School of Public Administration and Policy,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872)

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学,北京100872

出　　处：《科学．经济．社会》2019年第1期60-66,共7页Science Economy Society

摘　　要：目的论道德、现代性道德、人伦的道德构成了人类文明进程中三种主要的道德理解方式。目的论的道德理解与现代性的道德理解在决定论与同一性的认识层面上具有相似性,但却内在地遵循着极为不同的认识理路和布展方式,目的论道德理解居于传统,现代性道德理解囿于理性主义认识论。人伦的道德理解与目的论道德理解在基于相似性思维的认识理路层面上具有共通性,但在关于道德本身的具体理解上却呈现出明显的差异。三种道德理解方式在认识的延展性与开放性层面都存在各自的缺陷,目的论道德与人伦的道德更加具有现实的根基与生命,而现代性道德则是一种形式上的存在。道德的谱系理解作为一种批判具有存在合理性,但就其本身而言并未超出任性与虚无的辖制。Skopostheorie morality, modern morality, and human morality constitute the three main moral understanding methods in the process of human civilization. Skopostheorie’s moral understanding and modernity’s moral understanding are similar in determinism and identity, but they inherently follow very different ways of understanding and discourse. Skopostheorie moral understanding is traditional, modern morality Understanding is confined to rationalist epistemology. Human moral understanding and Skopostheorie moral understanding have similarities in their understanding of similarity thinking, but there are obvious differences in the specific understanding of morality itself. Three kinds of moral understanding methods have their own defects in the extension and openness of understanding. Skopostheorie morality and human morality have a more realistic basis and life. Modern morality is a kind of formal existence. Pedigree understanding as a kind of criticism has the existence rationality, but in itself it does not exceed the willfulness and nihility.

关 键 词：目的论道德 现代性道德 人伦的道德 认识理路 

分 类 号：B82-02[哲学宗教—伦理学]