转换休闲研究的思维范式  

Shifting the Thinking Paradigm of Leisure Research

作　　者：庞学铨[1,2] PANG Xuequan

机构地区：[1]浙江大学哲学系 [2]浙江大学旅游与休闲研究院

出　　处：《哲学分析》2019年第2期107-120,198,共15页Philosophical Analysis

基　　金：浙江大学文科教师教学科研发展专项资助

摘　　要：国内二十多年来的休闲研究和实践推广,对于我国休闲事业和休闲产业的发展发挥了十分重要的作用。与休闲实践推广和休闲产业发展相比较,休闲理论的研究明显滞后,这不但表现为休闲学作为一门独立学科及其理论建构尚未引起真正重视,也表现为休闲学基本范畴和重要观点纷呈多样、鲜有共识上。出现此种情形的原因可以举出多种,思维范式的问题应是其中值得引起重视的原因之一。目前休闲研究中通常所遵循和运用的三种思维范式值得反思,实现在休闲概念界定上从片断论向超越论的转换、在休闲本质认识上从体验论向存在论的转换、在思考方向与方法上从对象性向切身性的转换势在必行,这对于在休闲学基本范畴和重要理论观点上取得共识、建立规范的休闲学理论、推进休闲理论研究与实践应用的深入具有重要意义。The theoretical research and practical popularization in leisure for the past two decades in China have played an essential role in the development of leisure studies and leisure industry. However, compared to the development of leisure practice and industry, the research in leisure theories is much more to be desired. On one hand, not enough attention has been paid to the establishment of leisurology as an independent discipline. On the other hand, rare consensus has been reached on the categories and theories of leisure. Many reasons contributed to these problems, and one of them is thinking paradigm. This paper argues that reflections need to be made on the three thinking paradigm which leisure researchers frequently adopt: from fragmentalism to transcendentalism in defining leisure;from experience theory to ontology in the cognition of leisure essence;from objectivity to direct practicality in thinking orientation and method. These reflections are critically significant to the further study of leisure theories and to the establishment of categories and theories of leisurology.

关 键 词：休闲研究 思维范式 范式转换 

分 类 号：B2[哲学宗教—中国哲学]