学位类型与研究生资助——我国硕士研究生资助政策的瞄准效果  

Degree Types and Subsidies to Postgraduates:Targeting Effect of Postgraduate Funding Policies in China

作　　者：刘霄 杨钋[1] 阎凤桥[1] LIU Xiao;YANG Po;YAN Fengqiao(Graduate School of Education, Peking University, Beijing 100871)

机构地区：[1]北京大学教育学院,北京100871

出　　处：《研究生教育研究》2019年第3期44-52,共9页Journal of Graduate Education

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"专业硕士生的发展定位与竞争优势"(15JJD880002)

摘　　要：结合政策文本和大规模硕士研究生调查数据,从国家整体设计、院校实践和个人获得三个层面,分析我国研究生资助在不同学位类型硕士研究生中的配置问题。研究发现,当前国家层面的研究生资助政策关注资助体系的建立,不提倡对同学历、不同学位类型的研究生给予不同的资助待遇。但在院校实践中,学术型硕士和专业学位硕士面临不同的资助条件。虽然我国研究生资助的覆盖面逐渐广泛,资助规模逐渐增大,但是不同学位类型的研究生获得资助的情况存在着明显差异。学术硕士不仅学费低于专业硕士,而且其获得总资助、赠予型资助和报酬型资助的比例和金额都比专业硕士要高。Based on policies and the data from large-scale postgraduate surveys, this paper analyzes in three aspects the funding problems to postgraduates who study for different degrees, i.e. the national overall design, the practical situation at universities, and personal gains. According to the study, the authors find that China now pays attention to the establishment of a postgraduate funding system and does not encourage different subsidies to postgraduates with the same record of formal schooling but in pursuit of different degree types. However, in practice, academic postgraduates and professional postgraduates face different funding situations at universities. Although the coverage of funding for postgraduates in China becomes gradually larger with more money granted to students, the postgraduates studying in different degree types are obviously different when it comes to the sum of the subsidies. In comparison, the tuition for academic postgraduates is lower than that for professional postgraduates and the proportions and sums of the grant subsidy and the remunerative subsidy for academic postgraduates are higher than those for professional postgraduates.

关 键 词：学位类型 研究生资助 瞄准效果 

分 类 号：G643[文化科学—高等教育学]