检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王绍东[1] WANG Shao-dong(School of History and Tourism Culture, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, 010070, China)
机构地区:[1]内蒙古大学历史与旅游文化学院
出 处:《原生态民族文化学刊》2019年第3期20-28,共9页Journal of Ethnic Culture
基 金:国家社科基金项目“多维视角下的内蒙古地区战国秦汉长城研究”(13BZS020)
摘 要:农耕民族和游牧民族都要面对灾荒的挑战,由于生产方式的特点不同,对抗灾荒的方法和手段也各有异同。总体来说,农耕民族对抗自然灾害最普遍、最有效的方法是储蓄,特别是粮食的储蓄。此外,灾前预防、政府救助、移民就粟,邻里互助也是农耕人群度过灾荒的重要手段。游牧民族对抗自然灾害的最有效方法则是移动,只要能够及时转移,躲开灾害,生产就能很快恢复。游牧民族还通过采集狩猎、互助协作,甚至部落兼并和对外战争的方式度过灾荒。Both farmers and nomads have to face disastrous famines. Owning to different characteristics of the mode of production, their ways against famines are also distinct. In general, the most common and effective way of farmers is to store food, especially grains. In addition, prevention, government assistance, migration, mutual-aid in neighborhood are also important ways for them. The most effective way for nomads is to migrate. As long as they can migrate timely, they will resume their production soon. Therefore, the nomads also managed to deal with famines by hunting, mutual assistance and even tribe annexation and wars.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43