检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周萱影 王正明[2] 李冬[3] 王炯琦[1] ZHOU Xuanying;WANG Zhengming;LI Dong;WANG Jiongqi(College of Liberal Arts and Sciences,National University of Defense Technology,Changsha 410073,China;College of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies,National University of Defense Technology,Changsha 410073,China;The PLA Unit 91550,Dalian 116023,China)
机构地区:[1]国防科技大学文理学院,湖南长沙410073 [2]国防科技大学前沿交叉学科学院,湖南长沙410073 [3]中国人民解放军91550部队,辽宁大连116023
出 处:《国防科技大学学报》2019年第3期179-186,共8页Journal of National University of Defense Technology
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(61773021,61703408,61573367)
摘 要:利用传统制导工具系统误差线性回归模型,对Bayes估计、主成分分析以及正则化分析三种改进的分离方法进行比较,分析它们在工程应用上的优缺点,给出了实际应用时的限制因素;结合海基导弹特有的初始状态误差,设计整体估计、分段估计以及迭代估计三种估计策略,给出了相应的分离步骤。仿真结果表明,文中给出的三种误差分离方法在不同的评价标准下具有不同的实际应用意义;而在弹道差评价标准以及方差评价标准下,分段估计和迭代估计策略下的误差分离结果要明显好于传统整体估计结果。Based on the traditional linear regression model of guidance instrumental systematic error,the advantages and disadvantages of three parameter estimation methods were compared,namely Bayes estimate,principal component analysis and regularization method,and the practical limitations were presented. Combined with the specific initial error of sea-based missile,three estimation strategies named overall were designed,namely piecewise and iteration estimate strategy and giving detail estimate procedures,and the following separation steps were provided. Results show that the principal component analysis and regularization method are better than Bayes estimation,and the new proposed estimation strategies are better than the traditional one.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3