机构地区:[1]Department of Medicine,Division of Hematology/Oncology,Maimonides Medical Center,Brooklyn,NY 11219,United States [2]Queens Hospital Center,Jamaica,NY 11418,United States [3]Department of General Internal Medicine,Brigham and Women’s Hospital,Boston,MA 02115,United States
出 处:《World Journal of Clinical Oncology》2019年第5期201-212,共12页世界临床肿瘤学杂志(英文版)
摘 要:BACKGROUND Adjuvant chemotherapy using intraperitoneal(IP)treatment has demonstrated survival benefit over intravenous(IV)therapy alone in patients treated with upfront debulking surgery for advanced stage ovarian cancer.Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interim surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy has similar outcome in survival as compared to upfront surgery followed by adjuvant IV chemotherapy.IP chemotherapy has not been widely adopted in clinical practice for a number of reasons.Whether IP chemotherapy delivered in the patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be well tolerated or confers any clinical benefit has not been well studied.AIM To evaluate the experience of adjuvant IP chemotherapy in the community cancer clinic setting,and the clinical benefit and tolerability of incorporating IP chemotherapy in patients who received neoadjuvant treatment.METHODS We retrospectively evaluated toxicities and outcomes of patients with stage III and IV ovarian cancer diagnosed at our institution between 07/2007 and 07/2015 who received intraperitoneal chemotherapy after cytoreductive surgery(group 1)or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interim surgery(group 2).RESULTS Thirty eight patients were treated with IP chemotherapy,median age was 54 years old(range 38.6 to 71 years).In group 1(n=25),12(48%)of the patients completed 4 or more cycle of IP treatment after upfront debulking surgery;while in group 2(n=13),8(61.5%)of the patients completed all 3 cycles of the assigned IP chemotherapy after receiving neoadjuvant IV chemotherapy followed by surgery,and 2(15.4%)more patients tolerated more than 3 cycles.In those patients who did not get planned IP chemotherapy,most of them were treated with substitutional IV chemotherapy,and the completion rate for 6 cycles of IV+IP was 92%.Abdominal pain,(64%in group 1 and 38%in group 2),vomiting,(36%in group 1 and 30.8%in group 2),dehydration(16%in group 1 and 15.4%in group 2),and hypomagnesemia(12%in group 1 and 15.4%in group 2)were the most common adverse effectsBACKGROUND Adjuvant chemotherapy using intraperitoneal(IP) treatment has demonstrated survival benefit over intravenous(IV) therapy alone in patients treated with upfront debulking surgery for advanced stage ovarian cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interim surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy has similar outcome in survival as compared to upfront surgery followed by adjuvant IV chemotherapy. IP chemotherapy has not been widely adopted in clinical practice for a number of reasons. Whether IP chemotherapy delivered in the patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be well tolerated or confers any clinical benefit has not been well studied.AIM To evaluate the experience of adjuvant IP chemotherapy in the community cancer clinic setting, and the clinical benefit and tolerability of incorporating IP chemotherapy in patients who received neoadjuvant treatment.METHODS We retrospectively evaluated toxicities and outcomes of patients with stage III and IV ovarian cancer diagnosed at our institution between 07/2007 and 07/2015 who received intraperitoneal chemotherapy after cytoreductive surgery(group 1)or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interim surgery(group 2).RESULTS Thirty eight patients were treated with IP chemotherapy, median age was 54 years old(range 38.6 to 71 years). In group 1(n = 25), 12(48%) of the patients completed 4 or more cycle of IP treatment after upfront debulking surgery; while in group 2(n = 13), 8(61.5%) of the patients completed all 3 cycles of the assigned IP chemotherapy after receiving neoadjuvant IV chemotherapy followed by surgery, and 2(15.4%) more patients tolerated more than 3 cycles. In those patients who did not get planned IP chemotherapy, most of them were treated with substitutional IV chemotherapy, and the completion rate for 6 cycles of IV +IP was 92%. Abdominal pain,(64% in group 1 and 38% in group 2), vomiting,(36% in group 1 and 30.8% in group 2), dehydration(16% in group 1 and 15.4% in group 2), and hypomagnesemia(12% in group 1 and 15.4% in group 2)
关 键 词:OVARIAN cancer INTRAPERITONEAL chemotherapy Community setting Safety TOLERABILITY Outcome
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...