二分说在教唆犯具体事实认识错误中的适用  

The Application of Dichotomy Theory in the Concrete Factual Cognition Error of Abettor

作　　者：闫熙和 YAN Xi-he(Law Department,University of International Relations,Beijing 100089,China)

机构地区：[1]国际关系学院法律系

出　　处：《辽宁警察学院学报》2019年第3期120-128,共9页Journal of Liaoning Police College

摘　　要：具体符合说与法定符合说并非处于适用上的对立关系,在处理正犯及教唆犯的具体事实认识错误中,法定符合说认定困难、结论存疑时,不否认在同类型的共同犯罪内适用具体符合说的可能。未使用传统的从共同犯罪错误类型出发的分类方法,而试图根据共同犯罪人的故意样态及直接正犯的行为类型、结果类型的区别对共同犯罪中的认识错误进行分类,分别适用法定符合说与具体符合说,即适用二分法归类处理。The specific conformity is not in the applicable relationship with the statutory conformity. In the specific facts of the principal and the abettor, if the statutory conformity is difficult to determine and the conclusion is doubtful, it does not deny that it is applicable in the same type of joint crime. Instead of using the traditional classification method based on the common crime error type, the author tries to classify the misunderstandings in the common crime according to the intentional appearance of the joint offender and the type of the direct offense and the type of the result. In accordance with the specific, it is applicable to the dichotomy classification process.

关 键 词：具体符合说 法定符合说 具体的事实认识错误 共同犯罪 教唆犯 

分 类 号：DF613[政治法律—刑法学]